Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Luis Prieto-Duran

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1994No. 94-2071PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

Mr. Prieto-Duran appeals the imposition of a seventy-two-month sentence for drug offenses. The sentence was pursuant to a valid plea agreement, or Memorandum of Understanding, under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(1)(c). According to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(c), “In the case of a plea agreement that includes a specific sentence under rule 11(e)(1)(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure a defendant may not file a notice of appeal under paragraph (3) ... unless the sentence imposed is greater than the sentence set forth in such agreement.” Paragraph (3) provides that a defendant may…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Robert BolingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Terry L. PevelerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. TrujequeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Anthony Edward Sanchez, A/K/A Antonio Edward SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. LawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Alvin TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API