Legal Opinion

United States v. Trujeque

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1996No. 96-2053PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Patrick D. Trujeque appeals the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2), arguing that Amendment 488 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) entitles him to a shorter term of imprisonment than the eighty-four months he received. The district court denied Mr. Trujeque’s motion because his sentence was below or within the range calculated by Mr. Trujeque under the amended guidelines. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and conclude that, because Mr. Trujeque entered a plea agreement specifying a term…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Paula DenogeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. PhommachanhCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Jose Luis Prieto-DuranCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Terry L. PevelerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Buddie Lee SmarttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. ScurlarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. MainCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API