Crossen v. Oliver
Oregon Supreme Court
From Uhioh: Robert Bakin, Judge. Action by M. S. Crossen against B. W. Oliver. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolvbrton
This is an action for the recovery of real • property. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment, and the defendant appeals. The appeal is based upon alleged errors of the trial court in refusing two instructions requested, overruling a motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, and in permitting the attorney for plaintiff, in his argument to the jurj^, to argue from facts, no evidence of which had been adduced at the trial.
1. The first instruction requested and refused is as follows: “I instruct you further, gentlemen, that the mere statement of Mrs. Caldwell that she had sold the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Huber v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. ChildersOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- McCormick Machine Co. v. HoveyOregon Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Benson v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. AusplundOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Service v. Sumpter Valley Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Saratoga Inv. Co. v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Manning v. Portland Ship Building Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.