Legal Opinion

State v. Ausplund

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1917PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From Multnomah: John P. Kavanaugh, Judge. Department 1. Statement by Me. Justice Buenett. The defendant was convicted of the crime of-manslaughter alleged to have heen committed by producing an abortion and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary. He appealed from the judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

1. The first assignment of error is that there was no proof of the corpus delicti sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Substantially the testimony was that Anna Anderson, an unmarried woman about twenty-five years of age who up to that time was in good health, went to the office of the defendant, a practicing physician, on October 15, 1915. Previously she had applied to another physician who examined her and discovered that she was about three months advanced in pregnancy. She asked him to remove the foetns, which he declined to do. According to the statement of the defendant made to the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Pratt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. State v. DickinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. State v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 1901

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. NussbaumOregon Supreme Court · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API