Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1898PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From Marion : Geo. H. Burnett, Judge. L. F. Gardner appeals from a conviction for rape.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

The defendant, L. F. Gardner, was convicted of the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed by having sexual intercourse with one Mabel Hitchman, a female under the age of sixteen years; and, having been sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of seven years, he appeals, assigning as error the action of the trial court in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground of surprise, newly discovered evidence, insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment, and because the verdict is against law.

1. As a preliminary matter, it is insisted that the judge before whom he…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Giachetta v. MarquamOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State v. ClementsOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. State v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  5. State v. DrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1884

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. GayWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ross v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Goldfoot v. LofgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API