Legal Opinion

Huber v. Miller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1902PublishedCited by 35 opinions

From Multnomah.: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. Action by J. M. Huber against C. W. Miller. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

Three questions are raised by the record upon which the defendant relies for reversal of the judgment. The first has relation to a motion for a nonsuit, made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence; the second to a motion to direct a verdict for defendant; and the third has reference to the argument of plaintiff’s counsel to the jury, wherein, it is asserted, he was permitted, over objection, to go outside of the evidence adduced, and to resort to personal invective and abuse prejudicial to defendant’s case. These matters will be considered in their order.

1. The plaintiff, as a witness in his…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Frazer v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  4. State v. Foot YouOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. McDonald v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. SperouOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Marshall v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Cler v. Providence Health System-OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Stager v. Troy Laundry Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Carty v. McMenamin & WardOregon Supreme Court · 1923

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API