Legal Opinion
In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 9, 2005No. MDL 1409, M 21-95PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
These class actions, consolidated for pretrial proceedings, assert violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and the South Dakota Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), arising from an alleged price-fixing conspiracy among VISA, MasterCard and their member banks (collectively “defendants”) concerning foreign currency conversion fees. Defendants move for reconsideration of this Court’s October 15, 2004 Memorandum and Order on class certification. Defendants also move to stay…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ross v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Reid v. Unilever United States, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Alwert v. Cox Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Ross v. American Express Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.