Legal Opinion
Alwert v. Cox Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 26, 2016No. 15-6076, 15-6077PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Andrew Alwert and Stanley Feldman (Plaintiffs) brought putative class actions against Cox Communications, Inc. (Cox) claiming that it violated antitrust law by tying its premium cable service to rental of a set-top box. The district court granted Cox’s motions to compel arbitration. It then certified the orders compelling arbitration for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), and we granted Plaintiffs permission to appeal. They argue that the arbitration order is improper because (1) the dispute is not within the scope of the arbitration agreement, (2) Cox waived…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- City of Albuquerque v. Soto Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- BOSC, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Wakaya Perfection, LLC v. Youngevity InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. BowlineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Tiffany Johnson v. Continental Finance Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.