Legal Opinion

Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd. v. Trans-Oceanic Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1921No. Civ. No. 3945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Plaintiff and respondent brought this action to recover from the defendant and appellant possession of 920 tons of steel rails and accessories, or $75,000, the value thereof. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for possession of the property, and for costs. From the judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed.

The quantity of steel rails in question was pledged by the Sakura Trading Company, a partnership, its owner, to the respondent as security for loans aggregating $100,000, evidenced by a note for that amount. The money was advanced to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mulcahy v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Williams v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Lee v. De La MotteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Callahan v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Curtin v. SalomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Barth v. AdelsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Riverside Portland Cement Co. v. Anchor Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API