Legal Opinion

Barth v. Adelstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1944No. Civ. 14563PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Respondent sued appellant for $2,701.48 balance on account of money paid, laid out and expended to and for the use and benefit of defendant by J. A. Hogle & Co., herein referred to as Hogle. Appellant’s account with Hogle having been guaranteed by Louis G. Barth, Hogle made demand for payment thereof upon the executrix of Barth’s estate. She paid the account, took an assignment thereof and in turn requested appellant to pay her the amount she had paid to Hogle.

Although appellant was present at the trial he made no defense other than to object to the offer of appellant’s account taken from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Egan v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd. v. Trans-Oceanic Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MacHadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Richmond v. FrederickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Berrington v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API