Legal Opinion

Riverside Portland Cement Co. v. Anchor Laundry Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1925No. Docket No. 5254PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to compel it to transfer on its books certain shares of stock. The defendant appeared and answered the plaintiff’s complaint. Later M. E. Schaffer appeared as intervener and filed a pleading by him called a cross-complaint, in which he set forth a claim of title to the same stock and asked relief against the original plaintiff and original defendant accordingly. Schaffer’s pleading was answered by the original parties filing separate answers. A trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. The trial court entered an order of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd. v. Trans-Oceanic Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riverside Portland Cement Co. v. Anchor Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API