Legal Opinion

In re Rowland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1987No. 22743PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney disciplinary proceeding. Respondent engaged in the unauthorized practice of law following administrative suspension by the Commission on Continuing Lawyer Competence for failure to comply with the requirements for continuing legal education. The hearing panel *18recommended a public reprimand, and the Executive Committee recommended suspension for ninety days. We conclude respondent shall be suspended from the practice of law for two years, retroactive to the date of his original suspension.

Each active member of the South Carolina Bar is required to complete twelve (12) hours…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of RushtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. In the Matter of IsemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  3. In re AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. In re DiggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. In the Matter of GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API