Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Gregory

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 12, 1991No. 23510Published

1Opinion of the Court

306 S.C. 270 (1991)

411 S.E.2d 430

In the Matter of Ned GREGORY, II, Respondent.

23510

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard September 23, 1991.

Decided November 12, 1991.

Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock and Asst. Atty. Gen. James G. Bogle, Jr., Columbia, for petitioner.

Thomas H. Pope, III, of Pope and Hudgens, P.A., Newberry, for respondent.

Heard Sept. 23, 1991.

Decided Nov. 12, 1991.

2Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding in which respondent Ned Gregory, II is alleged to have committed various acts of misconduct in violation of provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility.[1]

In January 1990…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re RowlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. In the Matter of GregorySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. In the Matter of TedderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API