Legal Opinion

In re Altman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 18, 1985No. 22431PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This grievance proceeding charges John Graham Altman with 1) practicing law while under suspension in violation of DR 3-101(B); 2) being held in contempt of the Supreme Court; 3) engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation in violation of DR 1-102(A)(4); and 4) engaging in conduct tending to pollute the administration of justice or to bring the courts or the legal profession into disrepute, or conduct demonstrating unfitness to practice law, in violation of DR 1-102(A)(5) & (6) and Rule on Disciplinary Procedure § 5(D). The proceeding arose from respondent’s…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re RowlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Matter of EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API