Legal Opinion

City of Independence v. Hindenach

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 10, 1936No. 33,008PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court- was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This action involves the question of the validity of an ordinance of a city of the second class which attempts to im*415pose an occupation tax upon a dentist practicing his profession within the limits of the city. Other questions involved are the right of the city to maintain a civil action to collect such occupation tax, its right to appeal to this court when the total amount involved is less than $100, its right to maintain an action for injunction against the defendant dentist to restrain him from pursuing the practice of his profession…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. West v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Board of Commissioners v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Jackson v. LindsaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. City of Faribault v. MisenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  5. State ex rel. Mellott v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Independent School District No. 9 v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Wichita County v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mayor and Council of Wilmington v. DukesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  4. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Unemployment Reserves Commission v. St. Francis Homes Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API