Legal Opinion
Rich-Taubman Associates v. Stamford Restaurant Operating Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 6, 1984No. 83 Civ. 7413 (RLC), 83 Civ. 7412 (RLC)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
This ease arises from the collapse of plaintiffs’ plans to build two restaurants, one in Stamford, Connecticut, the other in Short Hills, New Jersey. Rich-Taubman Associates (“Rich-Taubman”) and TKUD Associates No. 2 (“TKUD”), the plaintiffs, have sued several parties alleging, inter alia, that they conspired to convert plaintiffs’ money, fraudulently concealed the fact that they were working to do so, and violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. The case is before the court on a motion to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Hampton v. HanrahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- New England Data Services, Inc. v. Barry BecherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Soper v. Simmons International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Center Cadillac, Inc. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Alfaro v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.