Legal Opinion

D.B. N.O. Ry. Co. v. Barry

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1904No. 1362PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant in error brought this suit against plaintiff in error to recover damages for overflows of a lot, which he owned and upon which he resided, alleged to have been caused by a dump constructed by the railroad company. The damages claimed were to the lot, to certain personal property, and for sickness of his wife and the resulting expenses of such sickness.

We deem it necessary to pass upon but two questions, and these require no detailed statement of the facts.

It is first complained, on behalf of the plaintiff in error, that the court erred in allowing damages for the sickness and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Rosenthal v. Taylor, Bastrop & Houston Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HayterTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Lipscomb v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Amarillo v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BehneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. City of Waco v. RookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. ReidenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API