Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Bigham

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1896PublishedCited by 390 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals, Second District, in an appeal from Taylor County. Bigham sued the railway company, and obtained judgment in the trial ' court for both injury to his person and damages to his cattle. Defendant appealed, and on affirmance by the Court of Civil Appeals obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

suit was brought by defendant in error against the plaintiff in error'io recover damages for personal injuries and for injuries to cattle belonging to him, alleged to have resulted from a defective.gate to a stock pen of the company. He recovered a judgment in the trial court upon both causes of action, which was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals.

The facts upon which the recovery was claimed are thus stated by the Court of Civil Appeals in their findings: "On November 25, 1892, the appellee, in accordance with a prearrangement made with the agent of the appellant, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Seale. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Gonzales v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Mexican National Railway Co. v. MussetteTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Sjogren v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by390 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. American StatesmanTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Carey v. Pure Distributing Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Bell v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

385 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API