Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Dixon

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1996No. 84334PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADAMS, Vice Chief Judge:

In this appeal from a divorce action, Appellant Nita Jo Dixon (Wife) argues that the trial court erred in characterizing certain properties as joint marital assets rather than her separate property. Wife argues testimony by Appellee Kenneth Dixon (Husband), admitted over her objection, about the source of certain property which the parties had stipulated was joint marital property should not have been allowed into evidence. She claims that because of these errors a monetary award given her to equalize the property division was too low by over forty thousand…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Mueggenborg v. WallingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Teel v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Stansberry v. StansberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marriage of Woodard v. WoodardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API