Dixon v. Dixon
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ADAMS, Vice Chief Judge:
In this appeal from a divorce action, Appellant Nita Jo Dixon (Wife) argues that the trial court erred in characterizing certain properties as joint marital assets rather than her separate property. Wife argues testimony by Appellee Kenneth Dixon (Husband), admitted over her objection, about the source of certain property which the parties had stipulated was joint marital property should not have been allowed into evidence. She claims that because of these errors a monetary award given her to equalize the property division was too low by over forty thousand…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Mueggenborg v. WallingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Teel v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Stansberry v. StansberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marriage of Woodard v. WoodardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007