Mueggenborg v. Walling
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ALMA WILSON, Justice:
There are two issues in this case: whether the trial court erred in finding that the appellant failed to prove that the parties had entered into a common law marriage; and whether the trial court erred in placing *113custody of two minor children with the appellee. A review of the evidence reveals that the trial court did not err in its judgment.
Although disputed, the record supports the following facts. In 1982, the appellant, Robert John Walling, then twenty-nine years old, moved the appellee, fifteen-year-old1 Julie Long (now Mueggenborg), in with him. In 1983, Long gave…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Lowe v. HickorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Maxfield v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Rath v. Maness Ex Rel. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Brown v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Kahre v. KahreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Berry & Berry Acquisitions, LLC v. BFN Props. LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.