Toyaho Creek Irrigation Co. v. Hutchins
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Beeves. Tried below before Hon. W. B. Smith.
1Opinion of the Court
CONNER, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment of the District Court of Beeves County in appellee’s favor, said verdict having been peremptorily directed upon conclusion of the evidence offered by- all ¡Darties, and the' action of the trial court in so directing a verdict and in so rendering judgment for appellees is attacked in various forms by the assignments of error herein.
The plaintiff below in substance alleged that it was duly incorporated; that on July 23, 1893, it was the owner in fee simple and in possession of a certain canal or irrigation ditch, commonly known…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Simmons v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Texas Western Railway Co. v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Frank v. HicksWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Callan v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- American Rio Grande Land & Irrigation Co. v. Mercedes Plantation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. LasaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.