Bolta Rubber Co. v. Lowell Trucking Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The defendant Lowell Trucking Corporation, a common carrier of goods by motor trucks, with places of business in Lowell and in the city of New York, was insured by a policy of insurance issued by the defendant Niagara Fire Insurance Company in the amount of $25,000 (increased by indorsement to $30,000) covering the loss of property upon a motor truck equipped with the Babaco alarm system and in the amount of $10,000 for the loss of property upon a motor truck not so equipped, against various perils, including “ (g) Theft of entire package (excluding pilferage).” The policy provided: “This…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Everson v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Collins v. Casualty Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Schiller v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Gulesian v. Newton Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Faris v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Niagara Fire Insurance v. Lowell Trucking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Giannelli v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- York-Buffalo Motor Express, Inc. v. National Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987