Legal Opinion

Burba v. City of Vancouver

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1989No. 55471-4PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

Nonresident customers of the City of Vancouver's municipal utility brought a class action against Vancouver alleging that a city gross receipts tax levied against utility revenues received for water and sewer services from resident and nonresident retail customers was illegal and unconstitutional. We hold that the gross receipts tax assessed against resident and nonresident users is legal and constitutional. We affirm.

Facts

The pertinent facts are undisputed. The City of Vancouver owns and operates a water and sewer utility serving wholesale and retail customers located inside and outside the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. King County Water District No. 54 v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hansen v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Dravo Corp. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Tacoma v. Hyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. GreweWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Nollette v. ChristiansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API