Hansen v. City of San Buenaventura
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
Defendant City of San Buenaventura (hereafter referred to as Ventura) owns and operates a water company which serves customers who reside both in and outside the city boundaries. In 1972, Ventura enacted an ordinance imposing a 70 percent surcharge on water supplied to customers living outside the city limits. Those nonresident customers brought this class action to challenge the surcharge, seeking declaratory relief and damages on the ground that the rates imposed were unreasonable, arbitrary, and discriminatory and that the rate structure denied them equal protection.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Durant v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Children's Hospital & Medical Center v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Brydon v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Citizens for Fair REU Rates v. City of ReddingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- County of Del Norte v. City of Crescent CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.