City of Tacoma v. Hyster Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This is an appeal by the City of Tacoma (city) from a decision of a trial judge holding the city could not impose its business and occupation tax (B&O) upon the Hyster Company (Hyster). The matter was appealed to Division Two of the Court of Appeals, which certified the case to this court.
Tacoma, a city of the first class, has had an ordinance since 1951 imposing a B&O tax on the privilege of engaging in business within its boundaries. All persons so engaged must register, whether or not they actually owe a tax.
Hyster is primarily engaged in the sales and service of forklift trucks. Although…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Department of Revenue of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kitsap-Mason Dairymen's Ass'n v. Washington State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Dravo Corp. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- General Motors Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Bellevue Sch. Dist. v. BRAZIER CONSTR.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- U. S. Oil & Refining Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Bellevue School District No. 405 v. Brazier Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.