Legal Opinion

City of Tacoma v. Hyster Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1980No. 46605PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This is an appeal by the City of Tacoma (city) from a decision of a trial judge holding the city could not impose its business and occupation tax (B&O) upon the Hyster Company (Hyster). The matter was appealed to Division Two of the Court of Appeals, which certified the case to this court.

Tacoma, a city of the first class, has had an ordinance since 1951 imposing a B&O tax on the privilege of engaging in business within its boundaries. All persons so engaged must register, whether or not they actually owe a tax.

Hyster is primarily engaged in the sales and service of forklift trucks. Although…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Standard Pressed Steel Co. v. Department of Revenue of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Kitsap-Mason Dairymen's Ass'n v. Washington State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Dravo Corp. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. General Motors Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bellevue Sch. Dist. v. BRAZIER CONSTR.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. U. S. Oil & Refining Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Bellevue School District No. 405 v. Brazier Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API