Legal Opinion

Hankin v. Hankin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1985No. 122 E.D. Appeal Docket 1984PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

This is the appeal of Harriet Hankin and the Estate of Samuel Hankin (Appellants) from that part of the Opinion and Order of the Superior Court reversing the Order of the Honorable Louis D. Stephan of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, appointing a receiver to liquidate an estimated $27,000,000.00 in partnership assets. Appellants, together with Moe Henry Hankin 1, Perch P. Hankin, and Pauline Shanken, and their spouses, (Appellees), for *606many years operated a family partnership composed of vast real estate holdings. Some of their properties…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Waddell v. ShriberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Tate v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. NORTHAMPTON N. BK. OF EASTON v. PiscanioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stainton v. TarantinoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Young v. DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Abrams v. UchitelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Estate of Cooper by and Through Cooper v. LeamerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Simms v. Exeter Architectural Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API