Legal Opinion

Tate v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1963No. Appeals, Nos. 162 and 168PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

This is an appeal from a decree appointing a temporary receiver for the Philadelphia Transportation Company (hereinafter referred to as P.T.C.). P.T.C. is a privately owned utility company which owns and/or operates the transit system of and in the City of Philadelphia, furnishing public transportation therein by street car, bus, subway and elevated railway.* Some of the facilities of transportation, viz., certain subways and elevated railway lines, are the *493property of the City which leases such facilities to the P.T.C. For the use of these facilities, P.T.C.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  5. Shapiro v. WilgusSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Waddell v. ShriberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Stainton v. TarantinoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API