Legal Opinion

NORTHAMPTON N. BK. OF EASTON v. Piscanio

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1977No. 264PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MANDERINO, Justice.

The dispute in this case arose as a result of the appointment of a temporary receiver with control over the business interests of the appellants. The Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County appointed the receiver on petition of the appellee as secured creditor of the appellants. The appellants argue that the court erred in appointing the receiver under the facts and circumstances of this case.

The facts of the case, briefly stated, indicate that the appellants were engaged in the communications business, leasing and selling various types of electronic…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Credit Alliance Corp. v. Philadelphia Minit-Man Car Wash Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Lindenfelser v. LindenfelserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Mintzer v. Arthur L. Wright & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  5. Large v. SteerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stainton v. TarantinoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Borough of Kennett Square v. LalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Hankin v. HankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Bogosian v. Foerderer Tract Committee, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API