Legal Opinion

McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1928No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

This appeal is from an order refusing to appoint a receiver. Appellee is a common carrier, incorporated as a railroad by an act of the legislature, with capital stock of $3,371,750, a mortgage indebtedness of $2,270,500, and an unfunded debt, represented by demand notes, of $1,000,000. The road runs from Huntingdon to Mount Dallas, a distance of 45 miles, with numerous branches.

All the property of the corporation, real and personal, and its future income, are covered by mortgages, the first, dated August 8, 1854, for $406,000, the second, dated January 13, 1857,…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Haywood v. Lincoln Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. SeltzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Cantwell v. Columbia Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Northumberland County Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. D. A. Tompkins Co. v. Catawba MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1897

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Stone v. Schiller Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Credit Alliance Corp. v. Philadelphia Minit-Man Car Wash Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Maxwell v. Enterprise Wall Paper Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Mintzer v. Arthur L. Wright & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  5. Waddell v. ShriberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API