Legal Opinion
Roger Fandel v. Arabian American Oil Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 25, 1965No. 18883PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOWAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, a husband and wife who reside in California, sued appellee, a Delaware corporation, in tort for injuries sustained by the husband in Saudi Arabia. In its answer appellee admitted its Delaware incorporation and that it had a place of business in New York City. 1 It moved to quash service of process upon it in the District of Columbia. The District Court granted the motion and dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction over the person of appellee, on the ground that it was not “doing business” in the District within, the meaning of either Section 334 of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mueller Brass Co. v. Alexander Milburn Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Neely v. Philadelphia Inquirer Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
- Layne v. Tribune Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Mutual International Export Co. v. Napco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Environmental Research International, Inc. v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rose v. SilverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.