Legal Opinion

Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 10, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-2499PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JUNE L. GREEN, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Thomas Dooley, has brought an action against numerous defendants alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, Title 18, United States Code, sections 1961 et seq. (“RICO”), and supplemental state law claims. Several defendants, including the United Technologies Corporate (“UTC Corporate”) defendants 1 , the United Technologies Individual (“UTC Individual”) defendants 2 , defendants Olin E. Smith and Olin E. Smith & Associates (“Smith defendants”), defendant Westland, Incorporated (“Westland, Inc.”) 3 , and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. FC Investment Group LC v. IFX Markets, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  3. Tara Ann Jungquist v. Sheikh Sultan Bin Khalifa Al NahyanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Ex Parte McInnisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Chenault v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API