Legal Opinion

United States v. Beer

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 19, 1927No. 2881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

This case involves a matter of reappraisement. Certain cotton laces were imported and appraised by the appraiser, at the port of New York. The importer appealed to reappraisement. On reap-praisement it was stipulated by counsel that the merchandise had no foreign or export value as defined in section 402 (b) and (c) of the Tariff Act of 1922 and that the same should be appraised at the United. States value thereof, as defined in section 402 (d) of said act. The general appraiser sustained the appraised value and the importer applied for a review by the board, assigning two principal errors,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1938
  2. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. United States v. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co.United States Customs Court · 1964
  5. United States v. American Aniline Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API