Legal Opinion

United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc.

United States Customs Court

Decided August 9, 1938No. 4376; Entry No. 796148, etcPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keeee, Judge:

This application for review involves fifty-six appeals for reappraisenaent of shipments .of turned and unturned steel tubing containing 1.40 per centum of chromium and no other alloy. The turned tubing is described on the invoices as “Geschalt,” the unturned tubing is without designation and all was exported from Germany during the period from November 7, 1935, to March 13, 1937. Re-appraisements 117845-A, 117846-A, and 117788-A. are test cases and the remaining fifty-three appeals cover so-called “duress” entries.

The merchandise was entered upon the basis of the United States…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BeerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. JamisonUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Nippon Dry Goods Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  3. Conkey v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Standard Fruit & S. S. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  5. United States v. SpringmanUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API