Legal Opinion

Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 5, 1962No. Reap. Dec. 10347; Entry No. 635, etcPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OliyeR, Chief Judge:

These are three appeals for reappraisement of the values returned by the appraiser on a photographic developing agent known by the trade name of Phenidone. The appeals, which were consolidated for trial and disposition, represent eight shipments of the merchandise from England during the period between July 1, 1953, and February 10,1954. Upon importation, it was appraised on the basis of United States value, as defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as in existence at that time. The said definition is quoted in the margin.1

Plaintiff and defendant are in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MuehlsteinUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. United States v. BeerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co.United States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Clayton Chemical & Packaging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API