Melton v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion. Division No. 3. ■' Error from District- Court, Texas County; Arthur G. Sutton, Judge. .. Action by Ivan S. Perkins against D. W. Melton to recover commissions on a real estate sale. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
This action was 'Med in the district court of Texas county •by Ivan S. Perkins, defendant in error, against Dr. M. W. Melton, plaintiff in error, wherein it was sought to recover one-half of the commissions obtained by Melton on a -’real estate sale, and for convenience the parties hereto will be designated as they appeared in the court below.
Plaintiff alleged that he had been a real estate dealer in Guymon, Okla., for 16 years; that defendant came from Kansas and settled in Texas county and defendant advised plaintiff that he, the defendant, was going to bring parties from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berquist v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Hughes v. Hudson-Brace Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Manion v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
- Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Snouffer v. First Nat. Bank of MedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Marshik v. Farmers Union Co-Operative ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926