Legal Opinion

Snouffer v. First Nat. Bank of Medford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 30, 1922No. 10748PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

The First National Bank of Medford commenced this action against A. T. Snouffer to recover judgment on a promissory note executed by Snouffer to M. M. Wilford dated the 21st day of August, 1917, which note was purchased by the plaintiff before maturity in due course and for a good and valuable consideration. The defendant filed an answer and an amended answer. The amended answer denied the execution of the note and pleaded that the note was obtained by Wilford by fraud, and .alleged that Wilford offered to sell the defendant 50 shares of stock in the Dixie Engineering Company at $20 per share…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carden v. HumbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Cedar Rapids Nat. Bank v. BasharaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Bilby v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Layton v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Packard Oklahoma Motor Co. v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Loveland v. LoafmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Brown v. ReamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Stout v. MottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API