Legal Opinion
Porter v. Schaefer
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 24, 1946No. Civ. No. 327PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
. MATHES, District Judge.
The Administrator seeks judgment against defendant.on behalf of the United States in the sum of $1,123.58 for violations of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 901 et seq. Injunctive relief is also sought.
The violations are alleged to have occurred in connection with the sale of imported Mexican clothespins to certain retailers in the city of Bakersfield, California. Determination of the maximum prices for imported clothespins is made pursuant to the Maximum Import Price Regulation (8 F.R. 11681).
In order to procure a maximum price to be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hetzel v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Porter v. SenderowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- McFadden v. ShoreDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elmers v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- United States v. Koch Bros. Bag Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953
- Auditor of Public Accounts of Illinois v. IzattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953