Legal Opinion

Hetzel v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1898No. 110PublishedCited by 66 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OP. APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hablan

delivered th§ opinion of the court.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error to recover damages alleged to have been sustained in consequence of the unlawful, obstruction by the defendant in error of D street in the city of Washington.

The jury having been instructed that the plaintiff could not recover anything more than nominal damages, returned a verdict for one cent; and for that amount judgment was entered in her favor, but.without costs. And that judgment was affirmed in the Court of Appeals of the District.

The declaration alleged that the plaintiff was seized in fee of a certain…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. United States Trust Co. v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. State of New York v. Hendrickson Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API