Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Freeland

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1999No. Civil 980169PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] In this case we are asked to decide whether passengers are liable for the injuries and deaths caused by an intoxicated driver. We are also asked to decide whether false testimony may create civil liability. We affirm the summary judgments of dismissal, concluding that absent a special relationship, not present here, there is no basis for liability on the part of passengers of an intoxicated driver, and there is no basis for civil liability based on the claimed false testimony.

I

[¶ 2] As reported in Hurt v. Freeland, 1997 ND 194, 569 N.W.2d 266, this case arises from an…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Price v. HalsteadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Verplanck v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Matter of Estate of StantonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Stewart v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Rodenburg v. Fargo-Moorhead Young Men's Christian Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hansen v. ScottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Haff v. HettichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Reed v. University of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Tibert v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API