Legal Opinion
County of Los Angeles v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 19, 1980No. Nos. 77-2138, 78-1142, 78-1232, 78-1275 and 78-1311PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
In these consolidated appeals a number of states and political subdivisions have challenged, on constitutional grounds, the failure of the District Court to afford them the injunctive and declaratory relief sought by them with respect to the 1976 amendments to the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA). These amendments extended the reach of that Act to the employees of state and local governments. Pub.L. No. 94-566, 90 Stat. 2667 (1976).
The constitutional objections asserted by appellants derive from the Tenth Amendment, and their reliance is upon National League of Cities v.…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State of New Hampshire Department of Employment Security v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
4Cited by9 opinions
- State of Oklahoma v. Richard S. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Brenda Crawford, Etc. v. Edwin L. PittmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Human Resources v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Jacquelyn M. Chagnon v. Griffin BellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.