Legal Opinion
State of New Hampshire Department of Employment Security v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 20, 1980No. 78-1564PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWNES, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 33101 of the decision of the Secretary of Labor that the New Hampshire Unemployment Compensation law fails to conform in six separate respects with the requirements of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA), 26 U.S.C. §§ 3301-3311.
In order to understand the issues involved, some explanation of the unemployment compensation law is necessary. The law has its roots in the Great Depression when unemployment was so widespread that the separate states were unable to meet the basic needs of their citizens. Several states, of which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- New York City Transit Authority v. BeazerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rivera v. PatinoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- Wimberly v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- McKay v. HornDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- County of Los Angeles v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Clancy v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.