Legal Opinion

Langston v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

-Shaep, J.

The demurrers to th-e complaints pose this question: Does the .provision in the notes- that the holder “.shall hav-e full power and authority” upon default to sell -the stock pledged .as security “it being understood and- -agreed that after such sale” the maker shall not -be liable for .any deficiency, require the holder to enforce collection by a sale of .the -collateral?

This question must ¡be answered by reference only to the complaint and the note Which is made a part thereof. We may not consider the “testimony” contained in -both briefs. If, .at the time of the execution .and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sykes v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Sykes v. . EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Carroll v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Fidelity Bank v. HesseeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. NCNB National Bank of North Carolina v. GutridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  2. North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API