Legal Opinion

Moody v. Peirano

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1906No. Civ. No. 163PublishedCited by 62 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. A. L. Rhodes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.

Action for damages for a breach of warranty of the quality of certain personal property.

The complaint states that the plaintiff applied to the defendant to purchase from him certain seed wheat of the variety known as “White Australian,” for the purpose of planting the same, and that the defendant thereupon sold to him twenty-seven thousand seven hundred and sixty pounds of seed wheat, and represented to him and warranted that the same was of the variety known as “White Australian”; that the plaintiff relied solely upon said representation and warranty, and planted the same on his land,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Sheldon v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Insurance Co. v. WeideSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Hill v. Portland & Rochester RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867
  5. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. People v. CollierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API