Legal Opinion

Knott v. Pratt

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 14, 1992No. 90-497PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

In this lawyer malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant, entered after a trial without a jury. The court found that defendant’s representation of plaintiff was not negligent, and, in any event, did not cause plaintiff any harm. Plaintiff argues that the court was wrong on both conclusions. We affirm.

In order to recover on a legal malpractice claim, plaintiff must prove both that defendant was negligent and that the negligence proximately caused plaintiff’s harm. Brown v. Kelly, 140 Vt. 336, 338, 437 A.2d 1103, 1104 (1981). In the instant case, the trial court found…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. My Sister's Place v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. Vahlteich v. KnottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. Legault v. LegaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. Dutch Hill Inn, Inc. v. PattenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. GibsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. Roberts v. ChimileskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Hannah P. Sachs v. Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC and Caryn Waxman, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  4. Powers v. HayesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Cannata v. WienerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API