Legal Opinion

Powers v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 1, 2001No. 00-033PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff Rachel Powers, administrator of the estate of Charles Powers, appeals from a ruling of the Washington Superior Court that granted summary judgment to defendants Katherine Hayes and the firm of Barr, Sternberg & Moss, P.C., dismissing plaintiffs attorney malpractice action. Plaintiff argues that the grant of summary judgment-was in error because there existed enough circumstantial evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding the issue of causation. We agree and reverse. .

On the eve of major surgery, Charles Powers hired attorney Hayes to draft a will that would leave…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Messier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Haynes v. Golub Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. O'DONNELL v. Bank of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. Politi v. TylerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. John M. Purdy, Jr. v. Jacob D. Zeldes, and Zeldes Needle and CooperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Thorsen v. Richmond Soc'y for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
  3. Leak-Gilbert v. FahleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Hannah P. Sachs v. Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC and Caryn Waxman, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. Fritzeen v. GravelSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API