Legal Opinion
Dutch Hill Inn, Inc. v. Patten
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 3, 1973No. 60-72PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.
This case was heard below on defendant Patten’s motion for the entry of “Settled and Discontinued.” The motion was grounded on a release executed in consideration of the payment of $500.00 by James Voris and Nancy Voris, individually, and as the principal stockholders (all but three qualifying shares) of the plaintiff corporation. The court declared the release null and void, ordered the return of the $500.00 and placed the cause on the calendar for further proceedings.
The cause then came to this Court on petition of the defendants to appeal as provided by V.R.A.P. 5(b)(2) on the single issue…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Veazey v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Sipes v. McGheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Neverett v. TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- Kendall's Admr. v. RoseberrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
- Davenport v. CrowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- My Sister's Place v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Fisher v. PooleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Electric Man, Inc. v. CharosSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Agency of Natural Resources v. GodnickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Vermont Union School District No. 21 v. H. P. Cummings Construction Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.