Legal Opinion

Cannata v. Wiener

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 19, 2001No. 00-488PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff Charles Cannata appeals from a decision by the Chittenden Superior Court denying his malpractice claim against attorney Marc Wiener. After a bench trial, the court held that plaintiff failed to prove that advice given by attorney Wiener was the proximate cause of any damage to plaintiff. We affirm.

This case arose out of a complicated real estate transaction that originated with the purchase of a building in Burlington, Vermont. The relevant facts, as determined by the trial court, are as follows. The building was purchased in 1985 by Prime Properties, which was a business…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of Fleming v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  3. Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. Knott v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. Powers v. HayesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dalmer v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Scott Mansfield v. Heilmann, Ekman, Cooley & Gagnon, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  3. Flood v. GeorgeVermont Superior Court · 2005
  4. Gulfport OB-GYN, P.A. v. Dukes, Dukes, Keating & Faneca, P.A.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API