Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Illinois Central Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1926No. 3PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKiNNey

The bill in this canse was filed by the complainant, H. L. Armstrong, against the defendants, Illinois Central Railroad Company, St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, and the Union Railroad Company, for the purpose of enjoining them from laying a track over and across his fifteen-acre tract of land located, in Memphis.

The Union Railroad Company is a domestic corporation. The other defendants are foreign corporations, but all own and operate railroads in Tennessee.

The complainant’s tract of land fronts south on South parkway seven hundred three feet, and has a depth of nine- hundred…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Union Lime Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Ulmer v. Lime Rock RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
  4. Railway Co. v. PettySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  5. Chesapeake Stone Co. v. MorelandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zirkle v. City of KingstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Campbell v. Lewisberg & Northern R. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Reter v. Davenport, Rock Island & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  4. Rogers v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  5. Memphis Natural Gas Co. v. McCanless Commissioner of Finance & TaxationTennessee Supreme Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API