Rogers v. City of Knoxville
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.
This case is styled in reverse, the defendant below, City of Knoxville, having appealed in error from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, H. E. Rogers, who sued for damages to his lots by reason of the construction thereon of an electric transmission line.
The city contends that it acquired the right to build the line under a grant of Tennessee Valley Authority dated July 2, 1952, purporting to convey to it portions “of the right of way formerly occupied by the Arlington Holston Quarry K V transmission line and the Arlington-Water-ville 110 K V line” some 20 miles in length and crossing at a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Chattanooga v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Muhle v. New York, Texas & Mexican Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
- Doty v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
- Railway Co. v. Telford's ExecutorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Draper v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
- AL Kornman Co. v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT, ETC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Tennessee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Jacoway v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- Vinson v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.