Legal Opinion

Zirkle v. City of Kingston

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1965PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

Appellants, Joseph P. Zirlde and wife, complainants below, filed their original bill stating they owned certain property located adjacent to the City of Kingston, which they developed into residential subdivisions intended for sale to the public. Among these subdivisions are two, known as Piney Woods and Oak Terrace, in which they installed a system of water lines and sewer lines beneath the surface of the subdivision roads, which roads were dedicated to the public use while other parts of said lines are beneath the surface of the land yet owned by the complainants.

The City of Kingston has…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doty v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Paint Rock Flume & Transportation Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hopper v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Armstrong v. Illinois Central RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Georgia Industrial Realty Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Castelli v. LienCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Shelby County v. BardenTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Duck River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of ManchesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Betty v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  5. City of Cookeville, Tennessee v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API